Donald Trump’s former campaign chief Paul Manafort
Donald Trump’s former campaign chief Paul Manafort was found guilty of fraud Tuesday, in the first trial resulting from the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
While the jury was unable to reach a verdict on 10 counts, prompting the judge to declare a partial mistrial, Manafort was found guilty on the eight remaining counts including tax fraud, bank fraud and failure to declare foreign bank accounts.
“Iwant all the girls watching here now to know that a new day is on the horizon!” Oprah Winfrey declared at the Golden Globes on Sunday night. She was accepting the Cecil B. DeMille award for career achievement and taking the opportunity to speak out against sexual assault in America. But to many viewers, it looked as though she was also in the process of launching a bid for the White House, and this speech was her “it’s morning again in America” moment.
Oprah’s speech was stirring, hopeful, even statesman-like — and many Democrats eagerly pounced on it.
“Lord, we need passion and excitement,” state Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter told the Washington Post. “I know it’s conjecture right now, but I’d ask her to give it serious consideration. If anybody could bring us together, it’s her.”
“It’s up to the people,” her longtime partner, Stedman Graham, told the LA Times. “She would absolutely do it.”
Complicating many observers’ response to the possibility of a President Oprah is our current president, Donald Trump, who like Oprah is a TV celebrity first and foremost.
“I think one of the arguments for Oprah is 45,” Nancy Pelosi told the Washington Post, referring to Trump by his rank as the United States’ 45th president. “I think one of the arguments against Oprah is 45.”
Trump and Oprah represent two poles of the fantasy of the celebrity president, one of America’s favorite daydreams. It was the fantasy America indulged when it elected Ronald Reagan, when it salivated over the Kennedys’ every move, when it mused over how Jon Stewart. Stephen Colbert, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, etc. should be president.
The celebrity president is an enduring fantasy, and that’s not (only) because America likes electing political neophytes to high office.Celebrities are avatars of America’s subconscious. They are the people onto whom we project all our deepest fears and fantasies.
Marilyn Monroe represented sex and innocence simultaneously; she is the vessel into which postwar American culture poured all of its erotic longings and all of its Freudian anxieties. Cary Grant represented postwar American masculinity at its most virile; Jimmy Stewart was the American Everyman, humble and downtrodden but always striving to do the right thing. Today, Beyoncé represents goddess-like empowerment.
So when we fantasize about electing a celebrity as president, we’re not imagining that Oprah is secretly a brilliant legislator or that the Rock has hidden depths as a policy wonk. We’re imagining that the perfect, untouchable, and morally righteous figure of our dreams can stride straight off the screen into the White House and make everything better.
Reagan and Trump both embodied different TV dad fantasies, to wild success
If anyone understood how powerful the fantasy of the celebrity president could be, it was Ronald Reagan. Reagan’s star image was practically designed for the presidency: all twinkling avuncular eyes and an air of condescending father-knows-best competence.
His competence felt familiar and reliable, because he’d spent years inside of American living rooms, on TV, and in movies. Reagan’s star image was a known quantity, intimate. He didn’t just feel like a father figure; he felt like your father figure, a sense that he courted and developed assiduously.
In televised press conferences, he spoke to reporters, the New Republic wrote in 1984, “on a cozy, chummy, faintly paternalistic first-name basis.” Reagan knew how to act as the benevolent dad not just to the nation, but to every individual person who might be in his base, right on down to the press pool.
The question of whether or not Reagan himself was a competent president was irrelevant to the fantasy he personified to his supporters. Reagan didn’t need to be good at his job; he just needed to look like he was good at it.
He embodied the ideal of a benevolent patriarch for the conservative base that he mobilized, who badly wanted a father-knows-best type at the helm. They wanted someone to bring the hippies and the poor and the minorities and the counterculture types in line — but someone who would do it in a way that felt respectable. Fatherly.
In truth, Trump was a reality star just waiting for the reality age: No other medium portrays his impulse toward conspicuous consumption and conspicuous demonstrations of power as effectively. With The Apprentice, Trump solidified the reality era–tinged understanding of the American dream: It’s not actual hard work that makes you successful, but the ability to evince the feeling and effect of power and wealth.
Trump didn’t exude competence and fatherliness so much as he exuded wealth, power, a kind of crassness that can feel like honesty, and most of all, rage at those who had made America not great anymore. Only Trump’s wealth, power, and greed could fix it. He was Archie Bunker to Reagan’s Ward Cleaver, and he became wildly successful.
Oprah’s star image is based on empathy, wisdom, and success — qualities in demand from a large swath of the electorate
The President Oprah fantasy is different. Oprah’s star image is rooted not so much in rage and resentment as it is in a sense of wisdom and kindness and empathy.
Oprah the celebrity is not a condescending-but-correct Leave It to Beaver dad, like Reagan was, or a furious real-talk-delivery-system Archie Bunker dad, like Trump. Instead, she’s a nonthreatening, endlessly positive mother figure. She loves you no matter what. She is wise and positive and understanding. When she talks to her audience onscreen, you feel like she’s talking just to you.
Director Ava DuVernay has called Oprah “the all–knowing, wisest lady in the universe.” Oprah is “the best woman alive,” the Miami New Times once declared. “Oprah has a unique way of connecting with people,” says Forbes.
“She understands how to connect with audiences and give them what they want at a particular time,” Janice Peck, author of The Age of Oprah, told me. “She’s always been very smart at figuring at who her audience is and how to resonate with them.”
“She’s identified as this warm, caring, super successful, and absolutely non-controversial figure,” Peck explained. “There’s this sense that Oprah would be good at being president because she’s so good at all this other stuff. She has an ability to connect with an audience.”
But Peck argues that Oprah’s ability to connect with her audience is in and of itself political. Part of the secret to her enduring appeal, Peck says, is her ability to keep white women — her biggest demographic — from thinking of her as black. “You have all these white fans who have historically talked about her as if she is a personal friend of theirs, as if she could come into their homes,” Peck said, “which of course she did, on their TV screens.”
Oprah Winfrey’s path to a (possible) presidential run
Oprah’s celebrity image, Peck argues, is at once empowering, carefully non-threatening, and appealing to mainstream liberals. “She’s a reminder of the ways in which there was supposed to be this erasure of race,” Peck argues, and of the post-racial moment that America was imagined to have entered after Obama took office in 2008 but which never truly emerged.
“She’s in favor of racial opportunity and fairness,” Peck said, “but she also has taken a lot of opportunities in her past to distance herself from the so-called black underclass, from those she considers to be angry black people.” (Peck cites remarks of Oprah’s like, “Race is not an issue. It has never been an issue with me. … Truth is, I’ve never felt prevented from doing anything because I was either black or a woman,” which Peck said seem to ignore the systemic inequalities of American society.) “And all of those moves cement her as someone that mainstream liberals can relate to and not be threatened by.”
The fantasy of President Oprah, then, is not a fantasy that supposes that Oprah Winfrey, billionaire businesswoman and media icon, is also secretly a political genius.
“Many of the same people horrified about Obama would be horrified about her, for racial reasons,” Peck said. “Then there would be gender reasons. It’s not like it’s everybody who wants President Oprah. The people who are really responsive here, she resonates for them because she is a neoliberal Democrat. She’s like Obama or Clinton. It’s like, ‘We need to bring that person back, and she’s got charisma. Why not?’”
It’s a fantasy that a figure of non-controversial warmth, wisdom, and empathy; of post-racial unity and post-feminist idealism; of the beloved Obama era — that this figure could take control of the country, affect change, and fix everything.
This is the antithesis of the fantasy represented by Trump. There’s a reason Trump impulsively said he’d like to have Oprah as his vice president back in 1999: Her image is a perfect photographic negative of his, warm and nurturing where his is harsh and abrasive, uplifting and giving where his is withholding and punishing.
The fantasy is the idea that when Oprah says, “I’m here to help you turn up the volume in your life,” she means it for all of us, forever. And that she can really do it — because if Oprah can’t, who can? (Vox.com)
Could Oprah Winfrey run for president and beat Donald Trump? The United States was ablaze Monday with speculation that the billionaire talk show queen might be nurturing White House ambitions after an impassioned Golden Globes speech.
Winfrey had barely heralded a “new day” following a sexual harassment watershed, before calls snowballed for one of America’s most famous women, a self-made tycoon born into poverty, to run for the highest office in the free world.
Hollywood’s loathing of Trump and Democrats’ bafflement that a crass-talking reality star with no previous government experience could win the presidency have fueled talk of, well, why not another television star, only one with the “right” politics?
Twitter ignited, Democrats championed her as superior to Trump and even Republicans admitted she was a formidable opponent to a reality star president, who himself named Winfrey as his pick for vice president in an interview 20 years ago.
The White House even waded in, saying Trump would “welcome the challenge, whether it be Oprah Winfrey or anybody else,” when a spokesman was grilled aboard Air Force One.
The only fly in the ointment? Winfrey’s denial.
“I don’t, I don’t,” she reportedly said backstage at the Globes when asked if she planned to run.
“There’ll be no running for office of any kind for me,” she told CBS in October.
But fevered speculation only escalated. “Oprah for president? She’s got my vote,” tweeted pop superstar Lady Gaga.
CNN quoted two anonymous “close friends” as saying Winfrey was “actively thinking” about a presidential run. Her longtime partner suggested that she could be persuaded.
‘Isn’t that crazy’
“It’s up to the people,” Stedman Graham was quoted as telling the Los Angeles Times. “She would absolutely do it.”
“I want her to run,” Meryl Streep told The Washington Post. “I don’t think she had any intention (of declaring). But now, she doesn’t have a choice.”
If the speculation is wishful thinking, Winfrey’s fame and wealth, extraordinary personal story overcoming poverty, child sexual abuse and pregnancy to build a $2.8-billion fortune and Oscar-nominated acting career, would stack up nicely in her favour.
“I slept on it and came to the conclusion that the Oprah thing isn’t that crazy,” tweeted Dan Pfeiffer, a former senior advisor to Barack Obama, the president Winfrey was credited with helping to elect in 2008.
Bill O’Reilly, a Trump supporter and ex-Fox News anchor disgraced by sexual harassment allegations, wrote: “How can any politician attack Oprah, a feminine icon, human rights hero, civil rights champion and beloved human being?”
A March 2017 poll by Quinnipiac University gave Winfrey a 52% favorable rating compared to Trump’s then 41% job approval rating.
Despite Winfrey’s denials, she tweeted in September a New York Post editorial that trumpeted her as the Democrats’ best hope of beating Trump in 2020 with the message: “Thanks for your VOTE of confidence!”
Raised in Nashville, Milwaukee and Mississippi, 63-year-old Winfrey was raped and sexually abused as a child and became pregnant aged 14, but miscarried the baby.
After college, she went into journalism before reigning for 25 years as queen of the US talk show, ushering in an era of confessional television before becoming the first black woman to own a television network.
‘Don’t do it’
At the start of the Golden Globes on Sunday, host Seth Meyers playfully encouraged her to run against Trump. Becoming the first black woman to accept the Cecil B. De Mille lifetime achievement award, her speech wove together gender, poverty and race.
“For too long, women have not been heard or believed if they dare speak the truth to the power of those men,” she said to a standing ovation. “So I want all the girls watching here now to know that a new day is on the horizon.”
But there was also angst at the idea of electing another television star with zero government experience as commander-in-chief in charge of the nuclear codes.
“Oprah, Don’t Do It” advised a New York Times editorial, calling it a “terrible idea” that would show how far celebrity and ratings have repudiated experience and expertise.
But Republican strategist Rick Wilson suggested Trump’s election, once unthinkable, had rewritten the rules.
“There may be an equation here where the only thing that can beat a celebrity is another celebrity,” he told AFP. “The thought of Oprah isn’t as absurd as it might have been two years ago.”
But if politics is a money game, then the odds are still long.
“There is money around for Oprah, Michelle Obama and George Clooney — but the odds suggest The Donald is going to be hard to beat,” said Rupert Adams, spokesman for global betting chain William Hill. (Agence Presse France)
Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, will testify on June 6 before a House committee investigating alleged efforts by Russia to influence the U.S. election, ABC News reported on Wednesday.
ABC News, which said Page had told it about the scheduled testimony, also cited a letter the former Trump adviser wrote to the leaders of the House Intelligence Committee’s investigation in which he said witnesses the panel had already heard from had presented “one biased viewpoint.” (REUTERS)
The Hill’s Amie Parnes and Sidewire’s Jonathan Allen write in “Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign” that on the night of the 2016 election, the former Democratic presidential nominee looked through the draft of her concession speech.
“Look, I really just want to concede gracefully, wish him the best, thank everybody, and get off the stage,” she said.
“This is not a moment for me to do more than that.”
Chief strategist Jake Sullivan said: “Everything you said, we’re going to do in the speech.”
“But you have been saying for many months that he’s temperamentally unfit and that he would be dangerous, and if you meant it, you should say it,” he told her.
“And you made a case that all these people’s rights and safety are in danger- if you meant that, you should say it.”
But in response, Clinton said it wasn’t her “job anymore to do this.”
“Other people will criticize him. That’s their job. I have done it. I just lost, and that is that,” she continued.