Onnoghen: US, UK, EU Supporting Corruption – FG |The Republican News


Aidoghie Paulinus, Abuja


The Federal Government has said that the statements by the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union Election Observer Mission (EU EOM) on the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, portends tolerance for corrupt acts and the downplaying of the anti-corruption crusade of the Buhari administration.

The government also said the statements signified alignment with the opposition and endorsement of its position that the ruling party, and by extension, the Federal Government of Nigeria, is working on rigging the forthcoming elections.

This is the third time the government is reacting to statements by the US, the UK and the EU, having earlier said that the presidency will not bend rules or allow interference, and that the US, UK and the EU were not properly informed over concerns raised by the suspension of Onnoghen.

In a statement by the spokesperson, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, George Ehidiamen Edokpa, the government stated that the statements were inimical to the wellbeing and development of Nigeria, given their nuisance value of promoting sectional and religious divide in the country, anarchy and retrogression.

“The Federal Government of Nigeria notes with deep concern, statements made by representatives of foreign governments and international organizations resident in Nigeria, notably the Embassy of the United States of America, the High Commission of the United Kingdom, as well as the European Union Election Observer Mission, regarding the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), which demonstrate serious and unacceptable interference in the internal affairs of Nigeria.

“The various statements, especially of those referred to above, appear prejudicial and signify alignment with the opposition and endorsement of its position that the ruling party, and by extension, the Federal Government of Nigeria, is working on rigging the forthcoming elections in Nigeria. These statements also portend tolerance for corrupt acts and downplay the anticorruption crusade of the Buhari administration, knowing fully that the suspended CJN had not denied the charges against him and that probity requires of him to step aside while the case is under scrutiny.

“It is pertinent to underscore the unfortunate fact that statements, as referred above, are inimical to the wellbeing and development of Nigeria, given their nuisance value of promoting sectional and religious divide in the country, anarchy and retrogression. Now, more than any other time, Nigerians and true friends of Nigeria should be working towards repositioning Nigeria to realize her potential and sustainably provide the leadership expected of her.

“His Excellency Muhammadu Buhari had consistently demonstrated respect for the rule of law as a presidential candidate and as the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and would engage in nothing to the contrary. He also remains a man of integrity who has severally pledged free and fair elections. It is therefore absurd to presume that the suspension of the CJN is geared towards rigging the forthcoming elections in favour of the ruling party.

“For the avoidance of doubt, be it known that on three occasions that Mr. President went to court as a presidential candidate and lost his case, in 2013, 2011 and 2007, the presiding judges at the Supreme Court were all northerners and Muslims: Justice Muhammad Lawal Uwais, Idris Lebo Kutigi and Dahiru Mustapha respectively. In fact, in one instance, the presiding judge at the Appeal Court was from Katsina State and the President’s former classmate, yet, he lost the case. The minority judgements in his favour were given by two judges, both of them southerners and Christians: Justices George Adesola Oguntade and Sylvanus Nsofor.

“Resident embassies and international organizations invited to observe the forthcoming elections must therefore be wary of being drawn into the camp of the opposition, otherwise their neutrality, which is the hallmark of election observers becomes questionable. It is indeed unfortunate that foreign missions would align with the opposition and seek to negatively interpret actions by the Federal Government, no matter their positive basis and intention. Had the Federal Government been high-handed, would the opposition have been able to express its views even to the point of pouring invectives on Mr. President? How best can the corruption in the judiciary, which has enormously undermined the rights of the common man and made justice available only to the highest bidder, be best tackled than by ensuring that known cases are fundamentally tackled? Where is the rule of law, if justice is applied selectively?” the government queried.

The government further raised pertinent questions which it said, the opposition and their sympathizers must reflect upon.

“Pertinent questions that the opposition and their sympathizers must reflect upon are: How has the action of Mr. President undermined the resolve for free and fair election? In what ways does it undermine the independence of the Judiciary, except in the minds of the opposition and its cohorts? What right has a representative of a foreign government to incense an already volatile situation on the grounds that her government has invested heavily in the elections? It is insulting for any foreign representative to claim the right to interference in Nigeria’s internal affairs, based on the premise that its government has invested heavily in the election,” the government added.

The government further said Nigeria had invested enormously over the years in election processes of many African countries and will continue to do so without interfering in their internal affairs.

The government also said interference in Nigeria’s internal affairs under any guise will therefore not be accepted.

“Representatives of foreign governments and organizations are therefore advised to tread with caution and desist from using the utterances and actions of opposition organizations and individuals as a vehicle to interfere in Nigeria’s internal affairs. Embassies and organizations accredited to Nigeria should desist from actions and utterances that can only create political, sectional and religious crises and divides,” the government warned.  (The Sun)

Continue reading


Executive Order Will Lead To Abuse Of Law, Order, Ohanaeze Ndigbo Warns|RN

The President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo said executive orders are an attempt to subvert the fundamental rights of the citizenry.

Raphael Ede, Enugu


President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo, Chief Nnia Nwodo, has warned the Federal Government against the use of executive orders, which, he said, could lead to excessive abuse of law and order, thus, “unacceptable in a democratic dispensation.”

Nwodo, who stated this in a statement he issued through his Media Adviser, Chief Emeka Attamah, said in exercising the orders, President Buhari must subject it to the provision of Chapter 4 of the constitution, which enshrines fundamental rights of individuals.

The President General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo said executive orders, in a situation where a state of emergency does not exist or has not been proclaimed, are an attempt to subvert the fundamental rights of the citizenry.

He opined that a man cannot be subjected to any disability except as provided by the nation’s constitution and judiciary, adding that it was not proper for the president to stay in his office and decide the fate of any citizen outside the provisions of Section 6: 33 to 45 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999.

“Ohanaeze Ndigbo affirmed that fundamental rights cannot be derogated from without judicial pronouncements,” he said.  (The Sun)

Continue reading


Buhari Signs New Law That Bars VPs, Deputy Governors From Second Term

By Anule Emmanuel

New law bars successor VPs, deputy govs from second term
  • State assemblies, judiciary get financial autonomy


President Muhammadu Buhari has signed into law a bill that will amend the 1999 Constitution which bars vice presidents and deputy governors who succeed their principals from seeking a second term in office. He also signed into law Bill No. 16, which means vice presidents and deputy governors who succeed their principals are not entitled to eight-year tenure.

The Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Senator Ita Enang, disclosed this while briefing State House Correspondents at the presidential villa, Abuja. He said: “The intent of the Bill No. 16is to ensure that where a vice-president succeeds a president or a deputy governor succeeds a governor he can no more contest for that office more than once more.

“The fact is that having taken the oath as president once and you can only contest for the office once again and no more. That is the intent of this amendment.” The new law also gives financial autonomy to state houses of assembly and judiciaries in the 36 states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). Enang said with the signing into law of the Constitution Alteration Bill, the State Houses of Assembly would now operate like the National Assembly where the Federal Ministry of Finance automatically transferred budgetary allocation direct to the account of the legislature. According to him, the Judiciary in the states under the new arrangement will also enjoy similar financial independence as their budgetary allocations will no longer go through the budgeting process of the executive arms at the state level. Such funds, he said, would henceforth be transferred directly to the account of the judiciary.

Enang said: “I just want to inform you that His Excellency President Muhammadu Buhari today assented to the Constitution Fourth Alteration Bill which grants financial autonomy and independence to the Houses of Assembly of the respective states and to the Judiciary of the respective states.

“Therefore upon this signature, the amounts standing to the credit of the judiciary are to be now paid directly to the judiciary of those states, no more through the governors and no more from the governors. “And then the amounts standing to the credit of the Houses of Assembly of the respective states are now to be paid directly to the Houses of Assembly of that state for the benefit of the legislators and the management of the States Houses of Assembly.

“This grants full autonomy now to the judiciary at the state level and the Houses of Assembly at the state level. This allows the State Houses of Assembly to operate like the National Assembly does because the National Assembly does not get its money from the executive. “It provides money in the statutory transfers which the Ministry of Finance will automatically transfer to the account of the National Assembly.” He said: “Just like that of the (Federal) Judiciary, you see the judiciary sometimes get N150 – N170billion sometimes a little bit about a 100billion. It does not go through the executive and it does go through the budgeting process of the executive. “It is transferred directly to the account of the judiciary, which is the head of courts.

When the Houses of Assembly are doing their budgets the amounts standing to the credit of the judiciary it will now going to be among the statutory transfers which will be statutorily transferred to the heads of the courts. “And then that of the State Houses of Assembly will stand transferred to the House of Assembly of the state.” President Buhari also yesterday signed into law the Constitution Amendment No. 21 which relates to a determination of pre-election matters. He said the new bill had reduced the days and time of determining pre-election matter to ensure that preelection matters in courts do not get into the time of election do not pend thereafter.

“The relevant section of the constitution has also been amended by this Act, therefore, amending the constitution,” he added. Enang said the president also signed the Bill No. 9 into law. According to him, the Bill No.9 gives the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) sufficient time to conduct by-elections. He said with the president’s assent to the bill, the days for the conduct of by-elections had been increased from seven to 21 days. “These four Bills added to the ‘Not Too Young To Run’ Act, have now been assented to by Mr President and they have now become laws. And then the constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended are hereby further amended by the assents of Mr President to these bills today,” (yesterday) he said.  (New Telegraph)

Continue reading


JUST IN: Buhari To Sign ‘Not Too Young To Run’ Bill |The Republican News

By Anule Emmanuel, Abuja




President Muhammadu Buhari has said that he will any moment from now sign into law the ‘Not too young to run’ bill.

The President stated this in a nationwide broadcast to mark the 2018 Democracy Day early on Tuesday.

He said, “In few days to come, I will be joined by many promising young Nigerians to sign into law the ‘Not too young to run’ bill”

The bill, which is part of the process to amend the 1999 Constitution, seeks to reduce the minimum age requirement for elective positions in the country.

It was first passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives in July 2017. Many state houses of assembly in the country have also passed the bill.

President Buhari also advised Nigerians to be law-abiding as the country enters into a season of another round of election for 2019.

According to him, “The upcoming months will usher us into another season of general elections. Let me use this opportunity to urge us all to conduct ourselves, our wards and our constituencies with the utmost sense of fairness, justice and peaceful co-existence such that we will have not only hitch-free elections but also a credible and violence-free process.”

President who assured that his government was committed to the fight against graft noted that the administration will not relent on one of its primary objectives in killing corruption before it damages the national social economic fabric.

He said, “The second primary objective of this administration is to fight corruption headlong. Like I have always said, if we don’t kill corruption, corruption will destroy the country. Three years into this administration, Nigerians and the international community have begun to applaud our policies and determination to fight corruption. We are more than ever before determined to win this war, however hard the road is. I, therefore, appeal to all well-meaning Nigerians to continue to support us in this fight.

“Various policy measures already put in place to stem the tide of corrupt practices are yielding remarkable results. Some of these key reform policies include Treasury Single Account, which has realised billions of naira being saved from the maintenance fee payable to banks. N200bn has also been saved from the elimination of ghost workers in public service.”

President Buhari seized the opportunity of the broadcast to reel out some modest achievement of his government in the last three years.
He noted that the whistle-blowing policy had helped the government to recover over N500bn.

“The Presidential Initiative on Continuous Audit, set up with a mandate to validate controls, assess risks, prune personnel costs and ensure compliance with Public Financial Management reforms, has helped to identify and remove over 52,000 ghost workers from the Federal Government’s MDAs Payroll.

“The Voluntary Asset and Income Declaration Scheme aimed at expanding tax education and awareness have offered the opportunity for tax defaulters to regularise their status in order to enjoy the amnesty of forgiveness on overdue interest, penalties and the assurance of non-prosecution or subject to tax investigations,” he added.

He continued that the Sovereign Wealth Fund project portfolio had been expanded with an injection of $650m so as to strengthen its investment in local infrastructure, power, health, reconstruction of the Abuja-Kano Road, Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, East-West Road (Section V) and the Mambilla hydro-electric power project as well as the construction of the 2nd Niger Bridge.”

Buhari noted that the fight against corruption, through the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission, had resulted in the recovery of billions of naira, as well as the forfeiture of various forms of assets.

“We have retained the services of one of the world’s leading assets tracing firms to investigate and trace assets globally. This is in addition to the exploitation of provisions of existing treaties, conventions as well as bilateral agreements with multilateral bodies and nations. Nigeria has also signed Mutual Legal Assistance Agreements to ensure that there is no hiding place for fugitives.”

According to him, through prudent spending and blocking of leakages, the nation’s foreign reserves had improved to $47.5bn as of May 2018, as against $29.6bn in 2015 while inflationary rate, had consistently declined every month since January 2017.
The President commended Nigerian women for their contributions to national development and advancement of democracy.

He urged Nigerians to avoid hatred and intolerance as this would help the country to achieve its developmental objectives in an atmosphere of harmony and peaceful co-existence.

Other achievements listed by the President include increase food security programme built around self-sufficiency and minimisation of import dependency.

The President said rice importation had been cut down by 90 percent, which he noted had a direct impact on foreign reserves, the Social Investment Programmes, Home Grown School Feeding Programme, and Conditional Cash Transfer where underprivileged Nigerians were given N5, 000 per month.

President Buhari described the commemoration of 2018 Democracy Day, which is the third anniversary of his administration, as a celebration of freedom for Nigerians.

He said the celebration was also a recommitment by his government to keep its promise to lead Nigeria into a new era of justice and prosperity.

Buhari admitted that his administration had faced challenges in the journey of three years while Nigerians stood by his government in achieving its three cardinal points.

He said, “Today marks the 19th year of our nascent democracy and the 3rd Anniversary of this administration. I am thankful to Almighty God for bringing us thus far.

“This administration came at a time that Nigerians needed change, the change we promised and the change we continue to deliver.

“We have faced a lot of challenges on this journey and Nigerians have stood by us in achieving the three cardinal points of this administration namely; security, corruption and the economy.

“The commemoration of this year’s Democracy Day is a celebration of freedom, a salute to the resilience and determination of Nigerians and a recommitment by Government to keep its promise to lead Nigeria into a new era of justice and prosperity,” he noted.      (New Telegraph)

Continue reading


Buhari, Saraki, Dogara Meet Over Budget, NASS Invasion, Melaye, IGP, Others |RN


President Muhamadu Buhari, Senate President, Bukola Saraki, Speaker Of the House Of Representatives

Juliana Taiwo-Obalonye, Abuja

The non-appearance of the of the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Ibrahim Idris, the ill-treatment being meted to Senator Dino Melaye, the invasion of National Assembly by suspected thugs as well as the passage of the 2018 budget were among the issues that President Muhammadu Buhari discussed with the leadership of the National Assembly.

Senate President  Bukola Saraki and Speaker of House of Representatives, Yakubu Dogara, on Monday afternoon on the invitation of President Buhari, told State House Correspondents that they talked on the key issues of importance to both arms of government.

Saraki and Dogara, arrived the Aso Rock in the same car to meet with Buhari, barely two hours after he arrived Abuja from his home state of Katsina, where he had participated in the ward congress of the All Progressive Congress (APC).

Saraki said the President invited them over to discuss with them his recent visit to the United States of America, the passage of the 2018 Budget, and the invasion of the National Assembly by thugs, but they used the opportunity to complain to him their reservations about the non-appearance of the IGP, despite repeated invitations.

They appealed Buhari to make officers of the executive arm of government operate within the ambit of law in their actions.

Melaye, who represents Kogi West Senatorial Zone, had been accused of gun-running and later, attempted suicide, by the police, which eventually arrested him, confined him to the hospital and later stretchered him to two different courts to face the charges.

Some hoodlums had on April 18th invaded the Senate and made away with the Mace, the symbol of authority.

Saraki on why they were in the Presidential Villa said, “Well, we came on the invitation of Mr President, he wanted to brief us on his trip to the United States and also the issue of the budget. We also talked about the issue of concerns to us, the invasion of the National Assembly, which he showed great concern and said action will be taken to investigate that.”

Asked when they are passing the budget, the Senate President said, “Well, hopefully, it should be laid this week. If it can be laid this week then it can be passed early next week but we are hoping it will be laid this week.”

On what was the President’s response on invasion, Saraki said, “Of course, he sees it as an embarrassment to the country and that there will be a proper investigation because is something that is not just about the National Assembly, it is about the country.”

On efforts to improve the strained relationship between the executive and the legislature, the Senate President said, “You see we are here today, it was the initiative of Mr President to brief us on his visit to America and to engage on discussions and I think that is a good sign. We in the National Assembly have always been ready to give all our support to the executive and we will continue to work along those lines. As I said, the presidential system that we operate, we sometimes have the responsibility to check the excesses of the executive, so there will always be times we will disagree but by and large, we will always work for the interest of Nigerians and always keep on moving on.”

On where the issue of Senator Dino Melaye came up in the meeting, Dogara said, “On the issue of Senator Dino, of course, anything that happens to one of our members or any member of the National Assembly is of concern to us. And there is no way we can have this kind of meeting without raising that. This is a civilian administration, it is a democracy and it is imperative and very very important that all institutions of democracy operate within the ambit of the rule of law.

“There is nowhere,  I have said it before that police will behave in a democracy like a clan of tribesmen, like an upgraded barbarians sort of. So there is the need for us to act with civility. We are not saying that anybody should be protected and defended. Once you have committed an offence, our law said you should answer to it but you just have to utilize the provision of our constitution, the rule of law and that this administration of President Muhammadu Buhari has overemphasised in order to bring people to book. But a situation where people are wheeled to court, that doesn’t give a good image of our democracy. I have not seen a democracy where people are wheeled to court, they are not in the proper frame of mind and they are forced to undergo trial.

“Whatever it is, even if Dino is pretending as some have said it in some section of the media, he cannot pretend forever. He is there, he will not run away, he is a senator and he can be tried any time he is in the proper frame of mind. As a lawyer, I can tell you, any judge that assesses an accused person not to be in a proper frame of mind, even if the accused person pleads guilty, he is duty bound by law to record a plea of not guilty if he is not satisfied as to the soundness of the mind of the accused person.

“So the emphasis is there and I believe the president being a listening president will definitely take steps and do something about it.”

Asked if the issue of planned impeachment process came up in the meeting, Dogara said, no as it wasn’t part of the agenda of the meeting.

“Well, I don’t think we have the authority to discuss issues of impeachment, impeachment is a political offence and I don’t think we are there yet.

“No, never. It wasn’t part of the agenda.”

Saraki speaking on the non-appearance of the IGP said, “Just talking about the issue of the police, we also raised the issue of the non-appearance of the IG at the Senate and felt that they must continue to ensure that he continues to apply obedience to the issue of constituted authority. We are of great concern that this is the first time this is happening and that this matter needs to be addressed considering the importance of the powers of the  constitution that gives investigative powers, also gives to us and that there is need for police to accept that they too are under constitution and they must obey that. We raised that concern.”

Saraki said the meeting was a good one as it touched on some of the important issues. (The Sun)

Continue reading


The Biafra Question, Igbo Question, Nigerian Question, Self Determination


This is a presentation by the secretary general of the Lower Niger Congress( LNC) to the Igbo Summit at Enugu, with the Theme: “Navigating the Future”, Convened by the World Igbo Congress, 27th May 2017 at Enugu).

The Lower Niger Congress has long legally been on the forefront of addressing Nigeria’s flawed constitutional problem and addressing the issue of agitation or self determination andconsequent referendum.

Here is the presentation from Lower Niger Congress Secretary General:



It gives me great pleasure to welcome us all to the Great Coal City, Enugu.
I must commend the Conveners, World Igbo Congress (WIC), for finding the Courage at this difficult juncture of the Igbo Odessey in Nigeria, to bring this Summit to Igboland, right in the middle of the 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Biafra,after many years of holding it’s major Public Events in the United States of America, where the LNC and I had had to go to engage our Brethren in the US on these never-ending Dialogue on the Igbo Quo Vadis.
I particularly recall the 2012 WIC Convention in Orlando, Florida, where I had gone to share with the Igbo US Diaspora important developments regarding the issues that now overarch the Igbo Question in Nigeria, which first emerged in 1966 as the Eastern Nigeria Question in Nigeria, turning rapidly in 1967 into what became the Biafra Question, recently resurrected by the younger generation of the East in what has raged on as the “Biafra Agitation”.
In my reckoning, it is this Trinity of a Question that this Summit has saddled itself with the task of Interrogating, with a view to finding viable answers for better Navigating the future of Eastern Nigeria.
Shorn of all embellishments, this Trinity of a Question simply seeks answers to the issues relating to Equitable, Consensual Protocols of mutual coexistence in the Nigerian Union from the perspective of the Igbo and by extension, Eastern Nigeria. It becomes “Biafra” when Consensus fail as it did in 1967.

The historical beginnings of the Nigerian Union is too well known to bear much repetition, but for the sake of that younger generation here present, that was denied the teachings of History as a School subject by their Country, and who, for no fault of theirs, are totally uninformed about how their Country Nigeria, particularly their Igbo Homeland component of it, arrived at the sorry pass and quagmire it now is in, and who befuddled by the pernicious reality they live in, raised a Campaign for the recovery of some fabled lost Paradise called “Biafra”, a little historical excursion will be undertaken.

Nigeria was a Colonial-era creation of the British. The Country Nigeria was  January 1st 1914 artificially cobbled together by the Annexation of the then Protectorate of Southern Nigeria to the then Protectorate of Northern Nigeria in an exercise officially tagged “Amalgamation”.
The mind-boggling failures of this otherwise giant promise on the African Continent has been the subject of many researches and academic inquisition.

Decades of routine, massive bloodletting which punctuate these monumental failures, came to global reckoning in the years 1967-1970 when Eastern Nigeria, one of the four Federating Regions that constituted Nigeria, suddenly found itself engulfed by Genocidal War which began as Pogroms.

The War was levied on the East by the rest of Nigeria, after the East Proclaimed itself the Republic of Biafra, May 30th, 1967 in a desperate bid to preserve the remnants of its population who were being massacred and decimated, in mass xenophobic killings by rampaging Northern elements who clung unto a false interpretation of a botched Military Coup in January 1966 in which leading Northern Politicians lost their lives.

Those pogroms collapsed the Union of Nigeria in 1966 as Easterners fled massively homewards for safety and the attempt to revive the Union failed in January 1967, after an Accord reached in ABURI, Ghana with the East was jettisoned by the Federal Side (basically, the rest of Nigeria in that period).

In the War that erupted, over 3.5 million Easterners perished amidst the search for Self-Determination, in circumstances that cast a shadow of doubt on the humanity of mankind in that era.

The gory pictures from the killing fields of Eastern Nigeria, particularly the bony frames of dying, thoroughly malnourished infants, with protruding stomachs signaling the terminal stages of the dreaded hunger-induced kwashiorkor, defined the Biafra War in the global media of that period.

At the cessation of bomb and bullet hostilities in 1970, the Victorious Federal side, isolated the Igbo of Eastern Nigeria and continued the War by other means, particularly on the Economic, Political and other insidious fronts, despite a bogus Declaration of 1970 “No Victor, No Vanquished” Proclamation and the even more bogus “Three R’s”, (Reconstruction, Rehabilitation, and Reconciliation) by the Federal Government, ostensibly to rebuild the damaged East and to reintegrate the surviving Igbo into Nigeria.

By 1979, the Victorious Federal Alliance of the Rest of Nigeria formally codified the Unilaterally-Imposed Terms of the Nigerian Federation by way of the so-called 1979 “Constitution”, replacing the Negotiated Federal Constitutional Basis of Nigeria which got toppled and jettisoned by the Military in the aforementioned 1966 intervention.

In order to gain an insight into the dark contents and workings of the deliberate isolation and punishment of the Igbo East by the rest of Nigeria since the so-called end of the War in 1970, which degenerated to the point where a younger Igbo generation plunged itself into an inevitable Self-Redemption task framed as the “Restoration of Biafra”, and to therefore get a better handle on the situation of the Eastern Nigeria which is the subject of this Summit’s enquiry, it is instructive to examine the description of what really transpired, from the prism of what seems to be a divinely inspired confession made 1999 by an iconic scion of the Political North.

In the words of Lamido Sanusi Lamido, the immediate past Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and now the Emir of Kano:

“The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba Bourgeoisie have conspired to keep the Igbo out of the scheme of things. They have been defeated in war, rendered paupers by monetary policy fiat, their properties declared abandoned and confiscated, kept out of strategic public sector appointments, and deprived of public services. The rest of the Country forced them to remain in Nigeria and has continued to deny them equity. Our present Political Leaders have no sense of history. There is a new Igbo man who was not born in 1966 and neither knows nor cares about Nzeogwu and Ojukwu. There are Igbo men on the streets who were never Biafrans. They were born Nigerians and are Nigerians, but suffer because of the actions of earlier generations. They would soon decide that it is better to fight their own war and maybe find an honourable peace than to remain in this contemptible state in perpetuity. The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba Bourgeoisie have exacted their pound of flesh from the Igbo. For one Sardauna, one Tafawa Balewa, one Akintola and one Okotie-Eboh, hundreds of thousands have died and suffered. If this issue is not addressed immediately, no Conference will solve Nigeria’s problems.”

(Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, at a Public Lecture titled, “Issues in Restructuring Corporate Nigeria” 11th September, 1999, at Arewa House Kaduna).

For the sake of brevity, the Lower Niger Congress adopts this succinct 1999 encapsulation of the Igbo misery in Nigeria by Sanusi Lamido Sanusi and so invites all amongst us who may not understand what the whole Biafra-or-Death Campaign is all about, to hear the reason for that Campaign from the horse’s mouth as they say.

Of course, as to be expected, the situation has gone progressively worse for the Igbo, with the simultaneous introduction of violent Sharia by 12 Contiguous States of predominantly Muslim North since year 2000.
There is no doubt that the 1999 prophesy of Lamido Sanusi Lamido is fulfilling itself now, simply because nobody heeded that sober call for equity, publicly and passionately issued 1999.

Needless to recount here the details of the several debilitating Constitutional shackles, consciously emplaced by the same victorious Alliance of the rest of Nigeria against the East, in what now translates to a Master-Servant Constitutional Order, comparable only to the Apartheid-era South Africa, presently anchoring Nigeria’s “Democracy.”

The aforesaid imposed “1979 Constitution” emerged from the pretence at a Constituent Assembly, 1977, and was by the Decree No of 24 of 1999 issued by one General Abdusalam Abubakar, transmogrified into what we now have as the 1999 Constitution, with a 68-Item Federal Exclusive List Under which the East lost the ownership of key Economic Assets including Oil and Gas, Coal, vast Maritime space and Resources to the so-called Federal Government, as well as the right to work those Assets for the benefit of our People, including the right to generate and transmit Electricity or to build the road from Enugu to Port Harcourt, because it is now a Federal Asset.

It is against this backdrop that one can meaningfully examine the dynamics driving both the relentless, ubiquitous demand for ‘Biafra,” and the world-wide outrage of the Easterners at the highhandedness of the Federal Government in dealing with the Agitators.

It is also against this backdrop that we can meaningfully explore the options open to all sides to the Disputations: the Federal Government, the Igbo Leadership Collective as well as the Biafra Agitations.

The LNC posits that it is Self-Evident, well known Constitutional Grievances of Eastern Nigeria, bordering on Self-Determination, outstanding since after Aburi 1967 and now aggravated by the imposed post-War Unitarist Nigeria Constitution 1999, that needs to be resolved.

The LNC further posits that the situation at hand falls squarely into the category of matters for which the 21st Century Global Community emplaced a mechanism called “Referendum” for resolution.

The Countrywide Agitation for the Resolution of this vexed issue of distorted Protocols of mutual coexistence in Nigeria, has been framed as a Campaign for “Restructuring” in the last 10 to 15 years.

While the Conservative Elements amongst the Northern Political Establishment had been adamantly opposed to any renegotiation of the distorted terms of Nigeria’s Federation, compounding the situation by the simultaneous imposition of Sharia in 12 Contiguous States of the Predominantly Muslim North, the Yoruba West had been vociferous in demanding a return to the pre-1966 Federation Model.

The East which had been waiting patiently for the rest of Nigeria at the Aburi Bus Station (Restructuring), since January 1967, seems to have a new situation at hand, wherein the younger generation that did not wield rifles in the Biafra War, has completely lost faith and interest in the Union of Nigeria and has taken upon itself the task of extricating the East from what has clearly become a toxic Union of Nigeria, while some amongst the Older Generation Igbo still cling wearily to the dimming hope that some miracle might happen to save the dying Union of Nigeria from going into disintegration.

The LNC is firmly convinced that the urgent responsibility of the Igbo Leadership Collective which this Summit eminently represents, is to find sufficient Commitment, Courage and Tact to boldly advance this universally acclaimed Referendum Prescription as the Quid Pro Quo to the aforementioned three sides to the disputation, namely the Federal Government, the Biafra Agitation and the Igbo Collective whose sympathies clearly lie with Self-Determination at this time, whether in a Restructured Nigeria or in an outrightly Independent Eastern Nigeria, which has already assumed the sobriquet “Biafra”. Only a Referendum can establish what the Igbo Populace wants at this time. Nothing less will do neither is the current Unitarism sustainable. Something must give.

The imperative upon the Igbo Leadership Collective to tow this path of asking that the Questions raised by the Constitutional Grievances of Eastern Nigeria be referred to a General Referendum of the People is created by the now identified direct causative nexus between the impositions of the 1999 Constitution and the Constitutional Grievances of Eastern Nigeria, as well as the open Igbo Consensus on rejecting the fraudulent 1999 Constitution as the Basis of Nigeria.

It will be recalled that the Communiqué from the well attended World Igbo Summit held October 2016 at Gregory University, Uturu expressly stated that Nd’Igbo reject the 1999 Constitution as the Basis of Nigeria and seek a Return to the 1963 Constitutional Model that guaranteed the Autonomy of the Federating Regions.

Similarly, it will be recalled that Resolution Number 7 of the Communiqué issued by the World Igbo Congress Convention 2016 held in Detroit, USA stated that Nd’Igbo reject the 1999 Unitary Constitution as the Basis of the Federation of Nigeria.

Going forward therefore, the logical progression for the Igbo Leadership Collective is to identify with the aspirations of the Igbo People it Leads, by asking that the questions arising from the disputations on the Terms of Mutual Coexistence in Nigeria be Referred to a Referendum, if only to reconcile itself with the younger generation that now seems to have lost all confidence in the current Igbo Leadership, especially on this question of Protocols of Mutual Coexistence in One-Nigeria, for which reason it launched the ‘Biafra’ Agitation. More importantly, such a demand for a Referendum would help decriminalize the Self-Determination Agitation in Eastern Nigeria and operate as a potent lever of pressure on the rest of Nigeria, especially the North and the Federal Government to come down from their high horse on this issue and to stop the totally unnecessary bloodletting that has characterized their response thus far to the Eastern Nigeria Self-Determination Agitation.

It is no longer adequate for the Igbo Leadership Collective to make bland calls for “Restructuring” as it had done for decades now.

The disappointed Igbo younger generation actually view the call for Restructuring at this time as a euphemism by their elders and Politicians for supporting the retention of the One-Nigeria Status Quo since such calls are not backed up by any potent actions.

May I use this opportunity to inform the Politicians in our midst that the restive younger Igbo generation agitating for Self-Determination, now view the Igbo Politicians who swear to uphold and defend the obnoxious 1999 Constitution as directly responsible for the sustenance and reinforcement of that Instrument of enshacklement and enslavement against Nd’Igbo. This points to the urgent need to begin some kind of countdown to the winding-up process of the so-called 1999 Constitution. The 1990-1994 Frederick De Klerk Transitioning Template commends itself for a guide here.

As the push for a Referendum in the East gathers steam, the Lower Niger Congress (which is the aggregation of the Self-Determination Initiatives in the combined Old Eastern and Midwestern Regions of Nigeria seeking to Federate into a Prospective Lower Niger Federation as a part of the inevitable Reconfiguration of the failed Federation of Nigeria, according to the 1885 Ethnolinguistic Map Annexed herewith), is pleased to inform all that it already has in its Referendum Train, both the Niger Delta Agitations and the genuine Biafra Agitations, in contradistinction to the renegade elements driving the various Biafra Franchises.


Having treated the Igbo/Eastern Nigeria component of the notorious Nigerian Question, I now take a cursory review of the larger picture so that the Eastern component already reviewed gets situated in the larger Nigeria picture.

It is pertinent to do this cursory review because the LNC frames its Campaign as Self-Determination Campaign and not “Biafra”, also rejects the “Secession” paradigm which immediately isolates the East and unites the rest of Nigeria against the East. The LNC adopts an approach that takes Nigeria as a whole for Constitutional Reconstruction which may yield a Federation as we had up to 1966, or a Confederation as we would have had if Aburi was not abandoned or units of outrightly Independent Successor-States including the East. Everything would be decided by the People Via Referendum and Plebiscite. Nobody will abridge this.

It is in this vein that we recall that the British creators of Nigeria had ominously packaged it as a Marriage, with the North as the Poor Husband and the South as the Rich Wife. That Marriage has come to grief, and in dealing with the terminal issues that have arisen, it is important to bear in mind that the rules that guide Marriages both in the making and in the dissolution shall apply.

By a cablegram message of December 1913, the then British Secretary for the Colonies, Lord Harcourt, boss to Lord Frederick Lugard, had captured the purport and import of the impending Annexation of the then Protectorate of Southern Nigeria to the then Protectorate of Northern in the following words:

“We have released Northern Nigeria from the leading strings of the Treasury. The promising and well conducted youth is now on an allowance of his own and is about to effect an alliance with a Southern Lady of Means. I have issued the special license and Sir Frederick Lugard will perform the ceremony. May the Union be fruitful and the couple constant.”

It is noteworthy that the Amalgamation announced January 1st, 1914 was celebrated by grand durbars in Zungeru and Sokoto while it was greeted by loud protests amongst the then Lagos elite.

It was in celebration of this grand British bequest to the North, that the then Premier of Northern Nigeria, Sir Ahmadu Bello declared to his lieutenants in the week of Independence in 1960 that:

“The New Nation called Nigeria should be an Estate of our Great-Grandfather, Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We use the Minorities of the North as willing tools, and the South as a Conquered Territory and never allow them to rule over us, and never allow them to have control over their future” Parrot Newspapers, 12th October, 1960.

It is self-evident that the current Constitutional regime in Nigeria is the full implementation of this 1960 Script and it is within the context of that Mission Statement and Battle Script of 1960 that one can understand the mindset of the Northern political gladiators who in 2010 proclaimed that the North would make Nigeria ungovernable should Jonathan or anyone else from the South emerge President in 2011, since according to them, “it will be tantamount to stealing our Presidency.”
With all these in focus, the Lower Niger Congress posits as follows:

That the Union of Nigeria was a grossly inequitable imposition on the Peoples Southern Nigeria by the British Crown.
That all efforts to transform it into a Union of Agreement had been frustrated by those from the North, who proclaim they were born-to-rule the rest.

That the disputations constantly rocking the foundations of Nigeria are more of a deep-lying clash of civilizations than the previously held views revolving around shallow symptomatic issues such as Leadership deficit, Economic disparity and Corruption. These are are mere symptoms of the deep-seated malaise.

That the twin phenomena of Sharia and Feudalism, make the Union of Nigeria unworkable since the faith and social dictates of one group requires them to kill the other group who they consider “infidels” and inferiors. Since no one can compel the Muslim North to abandon Sharia and embrace Democracy and Constitutionalism nor can anyone compel the Christian South to embrace sharia and feudalism in place of Christianity and Constitutional Democracy.

It has been a Union of attrition.
That the attempt to “equalize” the two mortally opposed civilizations saw the elevation of mediocrity in the name of Quota System and now “Federal Character” and the result has been the wreckage the World calls Nigeria. The frustrations arising from this has more than anything else, fueled the demand by the Peoples of Eastern Nigeria to get off the yoke of Nigeria, with the routine bloodletting engendered by irreconcilable religious and political differences.

That the issues that led to the Biafran War remain starkly unaddressed to date, degenerating further by the oppressive actions of our conquerors.

The geopolitical alignments that drove the 2015 electoral round re-enacted a sharp imagery of the geographical formations in which the Nigeria-Biafra War of 1967-1970 was fought.

However anyone else may view it, this was the reading of the 2015 Electoral Map by Peoples of Eastern Nigeria. The heavy, undisguised partisan involvement of the Western powers on the side of rest of Nigeria Alliance in the rowdy 2015 Elections was a sad reminder of the unconscionable international marauding in the Nigeria-Biafra War.

The current escalation of the quest for an exit from the failed Nigerian Union must therefore be seen by the global Community in its true context as the continuation of an almost 50 years old fight for Self-determination driven by a clash of irreconcilable civilizations and cultures, erected by Colonial fiat.

Providentially, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples 2007, offers a fresh window of engagement with these volatile issues in a manner that steers everybody away from the specter of violence, since a simple Referendum can resolve the matter instead of War and violence.

It was in pursuit of this NON-VIOLENT option that the Lower Niger Congress stepped in in April 2015 by Convening a SOLEMN ASSEMBLY OF THE PEOPLES OF THE LOWER NIGER IN PORT HARCOURT 27th April 2015 at which it was unanimously resolved that the Peoples of the Territory shall go to a Referendum to determine their political future in exercise of their Right to Self-determination.

The East is now suing for the annulment of the fraudulently procured marriage of 1914.
Lower Niger Congress therefore invites all stakeholders including the International Community, to accept the pursuit of this peaceful process of Referendum as the most viable answer to the long-standing Biafra Question.

It needs be restated that what the Biafra Agitators are seeking is simply Self-determination, completely legitimate under the relevant United Nations instruments to which Nigeria is signatory. The method of pursuit is by way of a Referendum. It is therefore unnecessary to criminalize the agitations or introduce violence as Nigeria currently does in its heavy-handedness against the Biafra Agitators.

In the same vein, the Lower Niger Congress also calls on the Biafra Agitators yet to do so, to embrace the Referendum Option since it leads to the destination of the freedom they seek.

The Lower Niger Congress also calls on the Nigerian authorities to immediately release all persons detained in connection with the agitations for Self-determination and instead engage in dialogue, as is done in a democracy, especially since the President of Nigeria had at 2015 United Nations General Assembly called on the World Body to facilitate the exercise of that right for the People of Western Sahara in Morocco.
Thank you for your attention.



Lower Niger Congress.

Continue reading