Image

Britain Is No Longer A Top Military Power |The Republican News

Typhoons Kuznetsov opener   © Provided by Business Insider Typhoons Kuznetsov opener

 

Theresa May this week asked Britain’s defence secretary to justify the UK’s role as a “tier one” military power, causing dismay in the Ministry of Defence.

Underlying the statement is a realisation that the UK can no longer economically compete with top powers, defence experts told Business Insider.

“It’s a reflection of our economic status – times are tough,” said Tim Ripley, a defence analyst, adding: “It’s all about money… if you don’t have money you can’t spend it.”

 

The Prime Minister questioned defence secretary Gavin Williamson on whether money for the military should be reallocated to areas like cyber, and if Britain needed to maintain a Navy, Army, Air Force and nuclear deterrent all at once.

Ripley called it a retreat from “grand ambitions.”

“No matter how we dress it up, this newfangled cyber stuff is just an excuse for running away from funding hard power,” Ripley said.

Troops cross a river on military M3 ferry during Sabre Strike, a large-scale military drill © PA Troops cross a river on the military M3 ferry during Sabre Strike, a large-scale military drill

 

“If you don’t pony up the money and the hard power you don’t get a seat at the top table. No matter how to flash your cyber warfare is, people, take notice of ships, tanks and planes.”

There is a strong correlation between military power and economic status. The major powers including the US, China and Russia all demonstrate their strength through military posturing, and countries that don’t have enough resources for defence often pool with others.

Dr Jan Honig, a senior lecturer in war studies at King’s College London, said that shared defence can be disrupted in times of nationalism, and called it “highly ironic” that Brexit could mean the UK can longer fund its military.

“You can’t really do it by yourself even if you spent a lot more on defence which is not going to happen in this country with this measly economic growth and the uncertainty about international trade details,” he said.

The Prime Minister’s comments, which were first reported by the Financial Times, come in the context of her recent pledge of a fresh £20 billion for the National Health Service (NHS) and debate about where the money will come from.

Governments need to ensure that their policies have support from the people, and pouring money into the military is harder to sell then spending on the NHS and social welfare which are immediate issues, said Honig, adding that populations are now also more switched on to the horrors of war.

But Julian Lewis, Chair of the UK’s defence committee told Business Insider that he’s now concerned about whether May will be able to properly fund the military after the NHS pledge.

“I am not won over … by this jargon of calling it a ‘tier one’ military power… What I’m much more concerned about is whether Theresa May will be able to give the defence the money it needs,” he said, citing a “whole” of over £4.9 billion in the defence budget.

May’s comments will not lead to definitive action to pare down the military but are a clear sign of the direction of travel said, Ripley. (Business Insider)

http://www.twitter.com/RNNetwork1

Continue reading

Image

Anti-open Grazing Law: NASS, States Dare Buhari

national-assembly-abuja

Fred Itua; Juliana Taiwo-Obalonye Abuja; Sylvanus Viashima, Jalingo; Rose Ejembi, Makurdi

The rift between the Executive and the Legislature worsened yesterday. Barely 24 hours after lawmakers gave the marching order to President Muhammadu Buhari to act on the resolutions reached a joint session, which included a call to contain the killings across Nigeria and protect citizens’ lives and property or risk impeachment, they again took on the executive over suggestion that the anti-open grazing laws in Benue, Taraba and Ekiti states be suspended.

This came even as the three states dared the Federal Government as they vowed not to go back on its implementation.

Minister of Defence, Mansur Dan-Ali had in a statement signed by Colonel Tukur Gusau at the end of a security meeting, chaired by President Buhari on Tuesday, suggested the “need to employ other channels with the affected states to reduce tension by suspending the implementation of the Anti-Open Grazing Law while also negotiating safe routes for the herders.

“There is need to employ other channels with the affected states to reduce tension by suspending the implementation of the anti-open grazing law while also negotiating safe routes for the herders,” Tukur Gusau, Dan Ali’s spokesman, quoted him as saying.

It was part of the resolutions reached the security council meeting attended by all the security chiefs.
The anti-grazing law is already operational in Benue, Ekiti and Taraba states.

The three states have vowed not to go back on its implementation.

The Senate backed the anti-grazing Act, as it said like the National Assembly, state Assemblies have the right to make laws for state governments under the Land Use Act of 1977.
One of the resolutions adopted by the Senate read: “The Minister of Defence, Mansur Dan-Ali, should as a matter of urgency, withdraw his statement that states should suspend anti-open grazing laws.”
The decision of the Senate followed the adoption of a motion sponsored by Senator Barnabas Gemade, who argued that the passage of the laws in some states has not contravened the constitution of the country.

His position was supported by John Enoh who argued that the killings had been going on for years before some states passed the bills into law.

“If killings have been going on for over seven years, I don’t think going against anti-grazing laws will be the solution. It is unfortunate that after a security meeting, the only solution they could come up with was a ban on anti-open grazing.

“Sometimes, we begin to wonder if these herdsmen are being protected. The Senate needs to rise up and make a statement that the anti-grazing law is against not responsible for the killings. It also means that these people in authority still don’t have any solutions to these mindless killings.”

Emmanuel Bwacha (Taraba State) said Zamfara State where the Minister of Defence hails from did not have any existing anti-open grazing law but has the highest number of killings carried out by herdsmen.
Like the Senate, the House of Representatives also kicked against the suggestion that the anti-open grazing law should be suspended.

At plenary yesterday, the House wondered why states should be asked to suspend a law duly enacted.
Following a matter or urgent public importance raised by John Dyegh (Benue), the lawmakers resolved that the call to suspend the law was unnecessary.

Contributing to the debate, Nkiruka Onyejiocha (Abia) said the minister’s recommendation was uncalled. She also argued against the idea of colonies.

She said: “We can’t be talking of colonies. What people are doing is ranching. It’s not proper to say a state should suspend a law passed for the welfare of its people.”

Adopting the prayers of the motion, the lawmakers asked the Federal Government to “immediately submit a supplementary budget to the National Assembly to develop colonies in states that have agreed to donate lands (for them).”

Ekiti, Taraba, Benue, Miyetti Allah, others react

Meanwhile, governments of Ekiti, Taraba and Benue states have vowed to implement and defend the anti-open grazing law.

In separate reactions, the states reminded the Federal Government of the right granted them under the Constitution to make law for the well-being of their individual states.
According to Ekiti State Governor, Ayodele Fayose, the Federal Government lacked the power to suspend or abrogate the law enacted by the state government to prohibit open grazing of cattle in the state.

Fayose who spoke in Ado-Ekiti through his Chief Press Secretary, Mr Idowu Adelusi, hinged his submission on the fact that the constitution empowers the governor as the chief security officer to make laws for the good of the state through the House of Assembly.

“On this subject, the Federal Government has no control and cannot interfere. This is a matter of law. I want the Federal Government to know that we are operating a democratic system and that we are not in the military era when the government is run by decrees and fiats.

“Those in the Federal Government contemplating to suspend a law enacted by the state can only be appointed by a quasi-military government and not a purely civilian government.

“Let them know that the Ekiti State Anti-grazing Law has come to stay and we have no apology for that. Where were they when our farmers were being hacked down in various parts of the state?
“Thousands of farmers and other innocent people have been killed by Fulani herdsmen since January in Benue, Taraba, Adamawa, Nasarawa, Plateau states among others. Thousands of people have been displaced. Millions of naira worth of properties destroyed. The killings have become a daily occurrence.
“The Muhammadu Buhari administration does not have any solution to it. The Federal Government should find solutions to the problems and not try to reverse the gains we have recorded in Ekiti State and which is being replicated by other states where the leaders have the interest of their people at heart,” he said.

Reacting, Taraba State Governor Darius Ishaku reiterated that the open grazing prohibition law that came into effect in the state on January 24 has come to stay and no pronouncements can upturn it.
In an exclusive interview, the Senior Special Assistant (Media) to the Governor, Mr Bala Dan Abu accused the minister of acting without the proper understanding of the issues.

“I must say that the minister is ill-informed. He does not seem to understand the issues at hand properly and that explains their inability to resolve them. Herdsmen attacks predate this law. These herdsmen have been killing people for the past seven years or thereabouts. This is what necessitated this administration’s decision to come up with this law.

“The law as it is now is meant to stop the killings. If herdsmen no longer wander into people’s farms to graze on their crops, the crisis would be reduced greatly. The instances of cattle rustling would also reduce as it would become easier to secure the cows.

“So, if the government is blaming the wanton killings on the law, what about the states that do not have the law and yet there is just as many attacks and killings? Is it the law that is causing the killings in Zamfara, Plateau, Kogi and all the other states across the country where open grazing is not prohibited?

“I would not want to say that the Federal Government has ulterior motives but I think they lack a proper understanding of the issues here, and that explains their inability to tackle these issues.

“In any case, this law was duly passed by the state Assemblies of the respective states and so it’s only through the instrumentality of the Houses of Assembly that the law can be repealed. And Taraba State is not ready to do that as the reasons for law still remain valid,” Gov Ishaku concluded.
In a swift reaction, however, the state chairman of Miyetti Allah, Alhaji Sahabi Tukur described the decision by the Federal Government as long overdue.

Tukur, who alleged that the law was actually providing a shield for people to commit crimes and blame it on the Fulani called on the Federal Government to empower the traditional rulers and institutions to checkmate inflow and outflow of people within their chiefdoms and in doing so, control the security situations there.

In his reaction, former Nigerian Envoy to the Republic of Cameroon Ambassador Emmanuel Njiwa said the call by the Federal Government was not only unnecessary but malicious, noting that the states have taken positive steps towards developing livestock production and checking killings, which no one should try to stop.

In the same vein, the Benue State government said it would not go back on the implementation of the law and called on the Defence Minister to withdraw the “highly offensive statement.”
The House of Assembly, in a resolution read by the Speaker, Terkimbi Ikyange, condemned Dan-Alli’s statement and called on him to resign his appointment with immediate effect.
In a motion moved by the Majority Leader, Benjamin Adanyi, the House described the minister’s statement as unfortunate and unacceptable.

“The call by Dan-Alli is very wicked and capable of undermining the little peace that we have enjoyed in recent times in the state. I am aware that the National Assembly has called on him to withdraw that offensive statement. The House aligns itself with the decision of the National Assembly.”

In a related development, Commissioner of Information and Orientation, Lawrence Onoja (Jr.) urged Nigerians and the international community to compel the Defence Minister to prove to Benue people that he had no scores to settle in the crisis or playing a script of some unknown people.
“Why has the Minister of Defence not made a single reference to the plight of the 180,000 Benue indigenes taking refuge in eight IDP camps in Benue? These people are Nigerians who deserve to have a sense of belonging in Nigeria.

“Most of these people are farmers who could not go back to their farms for fear of being attacked by herdsmen who are still carrying out sporadic attacks on Benue communities, as we speak.
“Is the minister speaking for himself or on behalf of the Federal Government; because his latest outbursts are completely at variance with the position taken by the National Economic Council on ranching headed by the Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo.”

The Senate has set up an Ad hoc committee, to investigate the authenticity of a report by Amnesty International, wherein soldiers were accused of sexually violating women in North East.

Presidency declines comment
However, the Presidency said it has no comment on the threat by the National Assembly to evoke its constitutional powers against President Buhari.

When asked what was the Presidency’s comment was on the threat, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Malam Garba Shehu, declined.

“No, we will not comment,” Shehu retorted while fielding questions from State House Correspondents after the Federal Executive Council meeting presided by the president. (The Sun)

http://www.twitter.com/RNNetwork1

Continue reading

%d bloggers like this: