How Oba Erediauwa Persuaded Yakubu Gowon To Abandon Aburi Accord Because It’ll Lead To Breakup Of Nigeria |The Republican News

When on March 15, the Secretary of the Benin Traditional Council, Mr. Frank Irabor, announced that “the leopard is ill in the Savannah bush”, we knew exactly what had happened to the Omo N’oba N’Edo Uku Akpolokpolo Erediauwa (CFR), the 38th Oba of Benin, who was born on June 22, 1923 and ascended the throne on March 23, 1979.

Well, to an average Benin man or woman, such an announcement is well-understood. The Benin people value tradition and culture. And they are proud of it. I am from Ufosu in the Idanre Local Government Area of Ondo State that shares border with Edo State, so I should know.

The Oba of Benin is the traditional ruler of the Edo people and head of the historic Eweka dynasty of the Benin Empire.

The services of Oba Erediauwa are well-valued and will not be forgotten. Before becoming an Oba, as Prince Samuel Aiseokhuoba Igbinoghodua Akenzua, he was an outstanding civil servant. He, in fact, rose to become the Federal Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Health before he retired in 1973.

Along with others, he attended the Aburi meeting held at the Peduase Lodge where the conflict of Nigeria was discussed between January 4 and January 5, 1967. Aburi is a town in Ghana and a 45-minute drive from Accra, the capital of Ghana.

Those who attended the meeting were Lt. Col. Yakubu Gowon, Col. Robert Adebayo, Lt. Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu-Ojukwu, Lt. Col. David Ejoor, Lt. Col. David Hassan Katsina, Commodore J.E.A. Wey, Major Mobolaji Johnson, Alhaji Kam Selem and Mr. J. Omo-Bare. Others were Prince S.I.A. Akenzua (Permanent Under-Secretary, Federal Cabinet Office.), Mr. P.T. Odumosu (Secretary to the Military Government, West.), Mr. N.U. Akpan (Secretary to the Military Government, East.), Mr. D.P. Lawani (Under-Secretary, Military Governor’s Office, Mid-West) and Alhaji Ali Akilu (Secretary to the Military Government, North.) The Chairman of the Ghana National Liberation Council, Lt. Gen. J.A. Ankrah, declared the meeting open in his capacity as then the head of state of Ghana.

The following was agreed upon: “That Army to be governed by the Supreme Military Council under a Chairman to be known as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and Head of the Federal Military Government; Establishment of a Military Headquarters comprising equal representation from the regions and headed by a Chief of Staff; Creation of Area commands corresponding to existing regions and under the charge of Area commanders, matters of policy, including appointments and promotion to top executive posts in the Armed Forces and the Police to be dealt with by the Supreme Military Council. During the period of the Military Government, military governors will have control over area commands for internal security; Creation of a Lagos Garrison including Ikeja Barracks. In connection with the re-organisation of the Army, the council discussed the distribution of military personnel with particular reference to the present recruitment drive. The view was held that general recruitment throughout the country in the present situation would cause great imbalance in the distribution of soldiers. After a lengthy discussion of the subjects, the council agreed to set up a military committee on which each region will be represented, to prepare statistics which will show: Present strength of Nigeria Army; Deficiency in each sector of each unit; the size appropriate for the country and each area command; additional requirement for the country and each area command.

The committee is to meet and report to council within two weeks from the date of receipt of instructions. The council agreed that pending completion of the exercise in connection with re-organisation of the army, further recruitment of soldiers should cease. The implementation of the agreement reached on August 9, 1966, it was agreed, after a lengthy discussion, that it was necessary for the agreement reached on August 9 by the delegates of the Regional Governments to be fully implemented. In particular, it was accepted in principle that army personnel of Northern origin should return to the North from the West. It was therefore felt that a crash programme of recruitment and training, the details of which would be further examined after the committee to look into the strength and distribution of army personnel had reported, would be necessary to constitute indigenous army personnel in the West to a majority there quickly.

As far as the regions were concerned, it was decided that all the powers vested by the Nigerian Constitution in the regions and which they exercised prior to January 15, 1966, should be restored to the regions. To this end, the Supreme Military Council decided that all decrees passed since the military take-over, and which tended to detract from the previous powers of the regions, should be repealed by January 21, after the Law Officers should have met on January 14 to list out all such decrees.”

The decisions at Aburi amounted to, in terms of political and military control of Nigeria, that the country should be governed as a confederation.

Suffice it to say that the vocal military officers like Lt. Col. Murtala Muhammed, Major Martin Adamu and Major Theophilus Yakubu Danjuma did not attend the Aburi meeting. Prince Akenzua along with top permanent secretaries including Alhaji Yusuf Gobir, Phillip Asiodu, Eme Ebong, B.N. Okagbue and Allison Ayida deconstructed in Lagos, all that was agreed in Aburi.

On arrival in Lagos, Prince Akenzua discussed with Gowon and raised objections to what was agreed in Aburi. Gowon asked him to raise a memo which he did. I am sure a copy of the memo is with Gowon today while a copy is in the archives in the Presidency. Civil servants are to be seen and not to be heard and that is why Akenzua never released a copy of the memo to the world.

The memo dated January 8, 1967 began with: “Your Excellency, in view of my discussion with you last night, I am raising this memo in the interest our fatherland, Nigeria”. Akenzua traced the long hard road that Nigeria had travelled and stressed on the need to keep a United Nigeria.

He said in the memo that Gowon had given too much away in Aburi and that it would lead to the destruction of the country. He further added that Gowon had “legalised” total regionalism which “will make the centre very weak.” Akenzua alluded in his memo that a weak centre would lead to confederation and total disintegration of the country. It was the memo that prompted Gowon to summon a meeting of the secretaries to the military governments and other officials which was held in Benin City between February 16 and 18, 1967. If you look at the minutes of the Benin meeting presided over by Mr. H. A. Ejueyitchie, Secretary to the Federal Military Government, you will discover that it was a total rejection of what was agreed upon in Aburi. The Benin meeting interpreted in its own way the agreement reached in Aburi.

Till today, both sides (Gowon and Ojukwu till he died), interpreted what was agreed upon in Aburi in their own ways. One of the problems at Aburi was that a portion of the meeting was not recorded. The military excused the civilians at a certain stage during the meeting and it was alleged that during this informal chat that Gowon made certain commitments to Ojukwu especially on full regionalism.

Even till today, judging by the decisions reached at the last National Conference, we are still arguing on confederation or federalism.

As long as Nigeria remains one under federalism, the memo of Akenzua which was a wake-up call on Gowon and his efforts later will continue to be appreciated in no small measure.

The nation remembers and the nation appreciates.

Subscribe to The Republican News. Advertise with us. Call us for press release, enquiries. Email:, phone: +32497220468, +23481819650279, +32466100102

Continue reading

BIAFRA vs NIGERIA: civil war and the tale of reasons behind the war and the horror

By Ike A. Offor


The wartime video made by CBS News or any other third party should be more accurate about the tales of the war and the truth about events and the actual reasons behind the war. If one watches any from Nigeria, one could many a times see unbalanced narrative or even arrogant tone in the narrations. But this was perfect and attracted the attention of our reporters in The Republican News.

Despite already known and always recounted stories of massacre in the Northern Nigeria against the hapless women, children, unarmed men by mobs, and the lack of action by the federal government to stop such carnage on innocent Biafrans. A narrative that led to the Aburi conference in Ghana and concomitant Aburi Accord, which was agreed as palliation to the carnage and a better true federal structure of government in Nigeria.

This video was made two years into the war, by that period approximately 2 million of hapless children, women and young Biafrans have died through starvation, a ploy or scheme used by the federal government to win the war. A policy reportedly offered by Chief Obafemi Awolowo, finance minister of Nigeria, as a means to win the war against Biafra.

The Nigerian Army recorded a lot of casualties, both injured and dead, while starvation was the debilitating cause of death on the  Biafran side.

Narration by Mike Wallace, William S. Brown, Harry Reasoner and Jeff Gralnick


Recently, President Buhari in his address in Katsina state erroneously said that the oil has not been discovered before the war. He said that it was not ought because of the oil but for the unity of Nigeria due to the fact that oil has then not been discovered. But historical facts are the best way to discredit or credit any assertion. In this documentary it was laid out apparently enough for anyone to comprehend it.

President Mohammadu Buhari assertion about the war was either intentional or his sense of such crucial part of national  history  eluded him. But as a man who fought in that war and as a commanding officer of the federal army and a person within the rank and files of the military then, it must be assumed that his distortion of facts was indeed intentional.

Nigerian oil was discovered under British colonial government in 1949 by the time of its independence in 1960 Nigeria already was earning $7 million annually from oil export. The presence of British Petroleum,(BP), GULF of the USA were already conspicuous within the shores of Nigeria before independence and prior to the war.

At the beginning of the war,  Nigeria’s earning through oil moved from $14 million to 300 million during the war. Which oil then was exported if not the same oil we have now? It was evidently clear in history tales that the war was fought because of oil.

By the time of the war, Nigeria was already the 12th largest producer and exporter in the  world and forecasted to be either the fifth or the sixth in the world soon after.

In the narration, Mike Wallace, the legendary CBN broadcaster and reporter clearly said that the federal government knew that they cannot do without the Biafrans because they need their talents.

The Nigerian government was afraid of an independent Biafra as a potential hostile neighbour state  and expansionist unit. So, that fear was one of the reasons of not letting Biafra become a free state and a neighbour.

The reason, according to his discussions with Nigerian leaders, behind the lack of interest by the Nigerian government to engage in genocidal move to wipe the Biafrans out is because they need the talents of the Igbo and they want them back into Nigeria.

United States supported Nigerian government politically while they try to send aids to Biafrans, but they are not willing to step into the war. The narrative behind that is completely another thing.

While the Nigerian army had superior fire power,  the sheer will of the Biafrans was overwhelmingly enough to keep the Nigerian soldiers fighting for three years. While Nigerian soldiers enlisted for the fat pay, the Biafrans enlisted for their strong will for freedom. Perhaps this was why the war lasted for three years.

Biafrans were high-spirited, hardworking and very well determined to fight and win their total freedom from Nigeria and maintain their free independent new state. If and when markets were bombed, which of course is a war crime because it is occupied by civilians and not military, the Biafrans moved their markets into bushes and business went on as if nothing has happened.

The politics of the war and the reluctant attitude of the world great powers to aid to stop the war or even prevent it from occurring is another narrative that raised several questions. The aiding of Nigeria for the war and the lack of interest from the United States to get involved in the war is why the war lasted so long and took so many lives.