Image

U.S. Senate Overwhelmingly Votes To Override Obama Veto On 9/11 Bill, May Prompt U.S Citizens Sue Saudi Arabia

 

USA TODAY

WASHINGTON — The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to override President Obama’s veto of legislation allowing lawsuits against foreign sponsors of terrorism, setting up an almost certain and historic defeat for the White House on the bill.The House is expected to follow suit within hours, making it the first veto of Obama’s presidency that has been overturned by Congress.

Obama vetoed the legislation Friday because he said the bill — known as the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, or JASTA — would infringe on the president’s ability to conduct foreign policy. It was the 12th veto of his presidency.

Terry Strada, national chair of the 9/11 Families and Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism, speaks outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 20, 2016, urging President Obama to sign the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act.© Brian Tumulty, USA TODAY Terry Strada, national chair of the 9/11 Families and Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism, speaks outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 20, 2016, urging President Obama to sign the Justice Against Sponsors of…  

But after an intense, lengthy push by 9/11 survivors and families of victims who want to sue Saudi Arabia based on claims the country played a role in the 2001 terror attack, even Obama’s Democratic allies on Capitol Hill voted to override his veto. The final vote tally was 97-1. Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-.Nev., cast the sole vote against override.

“In our polarized politics of today, this is pretty much close to a miraculous occurrence,” said Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. Democrats and Republicans in both cambers have agreed, he said, that the bill “gives the victims of the terrorist attack on our own soil an opportunity to seek the justice they deserve.”.

The top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said he shared some of Obama’s concerns but said the victims’ rights outweighed them.

“We cannot in good conscience close the courthouse door to those families who have suffered unimaginable losses,” Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., said.

Over in the House, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has already signaled she will vote to override the veto.

“I’ve worked with these families for a very long time, and I think they should have their day in court,” she told reporters.

The measure was approved in the House by voice vote earlier this month and sailed through the Senate by unanimous consent in May. In recent weeks, however, there has been some pushback against the bill, which would create an exception to sovereign immunity, the doctrine that holds one country can’t be sued in another country’s courts.

Former ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton and former U.S. Attorney Michael Mukasey, both of whom served under President George W. Bush, warned in a Wall Street Journal op-ed earlier this month that the legislation could open Americans to such suits abroad.

“An errant drone strike that kills non-combatants in Afghanistan could easily trigger lawsuits demanding that U.S. military or intelligence personnel be hauled into foreign courts,” they wrote.

Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee, and committee Chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, have reached out to colleagues in recent days asking them to reconsider support for the bill. Thornberry sent them a letter saying that in addition to putting Americans abroad in legal jeopardy, the move undermines the United States’ reliability as an ally.

“We must work with other nations, even imperfect ones,” he wrote. “Requiring their government officials to participate in and give testimony in lawsuits — even when nothing has been proven — will create tensions and lead to less cooperation. I believe the net result will harm our security.

As the vote approached Wednesday, some members had said they may be wavering in their support. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, a co-sponsor of the legislation, told USA TODAY on Tuesday that he was “thinking about it.”

“I’m not sure that I want to — I just have to think it through, that’s all,” he said.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said he had “concerns about what this bill’s going to mean to America.”

“This isn’t to me about Saudi Arabia, it’s the blowback to us because we’re the most involved in the world,” Corker said. “What you really do is you end up exporting your foreign policy to trial lawyers.”

Still, he conceded the veto would be “handily overridden” and said he hoped to revisit the issue when Congress returns from recess after the November elections.

Terry Strada, national chairwoman for 9/11 Families & Survivors United for Justice Against Terrorism, said the veto override votes are a “tremendous test of our democracy.”

“I mean, do we have a democracy or does Saudi Arabia own us?” she said. Her group sent a letter to Congress Tuesday urging lawmakers to override “the President’s unjustifiable veto.”

Strada, whose husband was a Cantor Fitzgerald bond trader who died when the World Trade Center collapsed on 9/11, drove to Washington on Tuesday from her home in New Jersey to continue lobbying for the override vote.

In his unusual three-page veto message to Congress last week, Obama said he has “deep sympathy” for the families of victims of terrorism.

“I recognize that there is nothing that could ever erase the grief the 9/11 families have endured,” Obama wrote. “Enacting JASTA into law, however, would neither protect Americans from terrorist attacks nor improve the effectiveness of our response to such attacks.” USA Today

http://www.twitter.com/@RNNetwork1

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: